Why Aren’t Aptamers Mainstream?

RNA strand
Artists rendition of RNA strand.
 Image by UCL Mathematical & Physical Sciences via flickr

Aptamers are not considered a conventional technique. Aptamer selection technology was developed about a quarter of a century ago. In the beginning, aptamers were immediately thought to be a revolutionary start into solving many problems associated with the diagnostics and the therapy of diseases. However, multiple attempts to use aptamers in practice generally have been less efficient than what was expected initially, although some attempts were successful. There are problems impeding the widespread application of aptamers in diagnostics and therapy. The rapid breakdown of aptamers, especially RNA aptamers, by nucleases in biological media is a serious problem that puts limits on their practical application. The problem is that oligonucleotides can break down in just minutes, which is too short for most practical applications of an aptamer.

Aptamers also don’t stay in human bloodstream for too long because of our filtration systems. Human kidneys are able to remove substances with molecular weights smaller than most aptamers(15-50 nucleotides). Another setback with aptamers is that aptamer generation, in most cases, requires the availability of purified target molecules. Protein target molecules are expressed in cell cultures and purified by affine chromatography. These procedures are time and labor-consuming, thus delaying the production of corresponding aptamers.

Additionally, regardless of an aptamers high specificity, aptamers that recognize particular targets can also bind to molecules with a similar structure. Aptamer cross-reactivity can be an obstacle to their therapeutic application because of the possible side effects caused by aptamer interaction with other proteins; however, this problem can be avoided by introducing a SELEX negative selection step with structurally similar molecules.

Generation of aptamers seems to be a rather simple protocol, but in reality it is a time-

download
Image provided by pixabay

and labor-consuming process. The selected aptamers sometimes turns out not to have the best affinity and specificity due to a sub-optimal SELEX procedure. The SELEX process does not even guarantee that an adequate aptamer is created. There are many steps where things could go wrong. This includes problems like, degradation, contamination, accidentally selecting for the wrong target. Then after all that, you have to sequence your pool to what potential candidates their are for aptamers and then get those synthesized. Then, they must be tested on their target to see if they can even be called successful aptamers.

Even after 20 years of the creation of the SELEX process to select aptamers, only one aptamer is approved for use in therapeutics(Macugen). We still have a ways to go before aptamers can be utilized to their full potential. Several different solutions have been proposed and even put to use for the problems mentioned above but they still have not been enough to get the aptamer revolution started. As we get closer to developing quicker and more standardized protocols that are able to develop aptamers that avoid the mentioned current constraints, aptamers should start to become more mainstream.

 

 

REFERENCE

Lakhin, A. V., Tarantul, V. Z., & Gening, L. V. (2013). Aptamers: problems, solutions and prospects. Acta naturae5(4), 34-43.

 

About us:

Faith Murphy, Pre- Med focus on genetics.

Matthew Ponce, Mechanical Engineering.

Alexander Chui, Computer Science.

7 thoughts on “Why Aren’t Aptamers Mainstream?

Add yours

  1. Very informative post about aptamers and their limitations! Could you give examples on what is being done now in regards to solving the current problems with aptamers that are limiting its ability to become more mainstream?

    Like

  2. Could chemical modification of these aptamers improve some of these issues? If so, to what extent would modification have to go in order to make aptamers more relevant.

    Like

  3. Just thinking about the structure of RNA we understand that it’s interactions with other molecules are often due to hydrogen bonds. When compared to proteins, which are capable of forming both hydrogen and covenant sulfide bonds, I believe that aptamers may lack a certain relative strength. This lack if bond strength may be one of the reasons aptamers are not so mainstream. However Aptamer structure is often able to be simplified to two-D projections and offers an easier time for analysis and modification compared to the protein counterpart.

    Like

  4. Very interesting post. Is there any research and/or data on way the Macugen Aptamer was successful in selection? Was it through very careful and meticulous lab work or was this aptamer more “stumbled upon”?

    Like

  5. Great informative piece of the drawbacks of aptamers! I really like how well organized and thought out the post is written. Maybe in a future post talk about the ways some of these issues are being handled and solved, such as the rapid degridation of the aptamers.

    Like

Leave a comment

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started